Hamas Expresses Optimism for Gaza Deal Despite Lingering Obstacles

Amid ongoing negotiations for a ceasefire and hostage exchange, Hamas has voiced optimism regarding the possibility of reaching a deal. This development follows a surge in diplomatic engagement involving officials from the United States, Israel, Qatar, and Egypt.

In a statement released on Tuesday, Hamas described the talks as “positive and optimistic” and asserted that an agreement is “possible.” However, they also highlighted that Israel’s imposition of new conditions remains a significant hurdle. Both Hamas and Israeli delegations are currently engaged in indirect discussions in Doha, Qatar, with key figures from Israel’s Mossad and Shin Bet security agencies present.

Negotiation Framework

The proposed agreement is reportedly similar to a three-phase plan initially suggested by U.S. President Joe Biden. This plan aims to establish a “full and complete ceasefire” alongside the release of hostages held in Gaza. During the first phase, Israeli forces would withdraw from populated areas of Gaza while simultaneously facilitating the release of hostages. In exchange, hundreds of Palestinian prisoners would be released.

While the original plan called for a full withdrawal of Israeli forces, sources indicate that the current discussions propose Israel maintaining a presence in specific areas like the Philadelphi Corridor along the Gaza-Egypt border and the Netzarim Corridor that bisects Gaza. This stipulation has been a contentious point, with Hamas opposing any Israeli military presence on Gaza’s soil.

Recent Diplomatic Activity

The latest round of discussions in Doha represents the most intensive negotiations since earlier talks collapsed in August. U.S. National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan’s recent visit to Israel, Egypt, and Qatar further underscored the urgency of the matter. Accompanying him was Brett McGurk, a senior Middle East adviser to President Biden, who remained in Doha to continue diplomatic efforts.

U.S. officials believe there is momentum toward a deal, with one official noting that negotiations are at a “working level” and that progress has been made, though certain issues still need to be resolved. McGurk’s extended presence in Doha has been interpreted as a sign of optimism within the U.S. administration. However, officials remain cautious, stressing that a deal is not guaranteed.

Challenges and Local Sentiment

One of the key sticking points is Israel’s insistence on retaining a military presence in certain areas of Gaza. Hamas’s opposition to this condition has been one of the primary reasons previous negotiations failed. Observers note that public pressure on Hamas has increased within Gaza, where locals have grown frustrated with the ongoing conflict and the dire humanitarian situation.

On the Israeli side, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s hardline stance remains a challenge to the peace process. Netanyahu has vowed not to end the conflict until Hamas is fully defeated, further complicating negotiations. Some analysts have suggested that a phased approach could be more effective, allowing for hostages to be released incrementally as part of a broader agreement.

Prospects for a Deal

Despite these challenges, there is growing hope that a deal could be achieved. U.S. officials have hinted that conditions are more favorable now than in the past, particularly after a recent ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah reduced regional tensions. Israeli military successes, including the targeted killing of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, have also shifted the political landscape, potentially giving Israel greater leverage in negotiations.

While no concrete deal has been finalized, diplomats and analysts remain cautiously optimistic. If successful, the agreement could mark a pivotal moment in the Gaza conflict, offering a temporary reprieve for the war-torn region and facilitating the safe release of hostages. However, without a comprehensive resolution to the underlying issues, there are concerns that any ceasefire could be short-lived.